Loving v. Virginia declared what about interracial marriage?

Loving v. Virginia declared what about interracial marriage?

• A. Interracial marriage is legal
• B. Separate but equal is constitutional
• C. Prohibition against alcohol is unconstitutional
• D. The federal government may regulate state marriage laws

Answer: (A)

Interracial marriage being legal is the idea tested here. Loving v. Virginia held that state bans on interracial marriage violate the Constitution. The Court declared that the right to marry is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and laws restricting marriage by race lack a legitimate purpose and discriminate on the basis of race. As a result, anti-miscegenation statutes across the United States were unconstitutional. The other options miss the holding: the decision did not endorse “separate but equal,” it wasn’t about alcohol prohibition, and it wasn’t about federal power to regulate state marriage laws.

Interracial marriage being legal is the idea tested here. Loving v. Virginia held that state bans on interracial marriage violate the Constitution. The Court declared that the right to marry is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and laws restricting marriage by race lack a legitimate purpose and discriminate on the basis of race. As a result, anti-miscegenation statutes across the United States were unconstitutional. The other options miss the holding: the decision did not endorse “separate but equal,” it wasn’t about alcohol prohibition, and it wasn’t about federal power to regulate state marriage laws.